In a startling turn of events, significant revelations have surfaced in the ongoing phone tapping case implicating key figures Praneeth, Bhujangarao, and Thirupatanna. The remand report disclosed by the police sheds light on major issues surrounding the case, indicating a web of intricate involvement and clandestine operations.
According to the remand report, Praneeth, Bhujangarao, and Thirupatanna confessed during interrogation that the phone tapping activities were initiated under the directives of former Special Intelligence Branch chief Prabhakar Rao. Their statements paint Prabhakar Rao as the mastermind behind the illicit phone tapping operations, implicating him as the central figure in the case. Consequently, Prabhakar Rao has been designated as A1 by the police, while Praneeth Rao, Radhakishan, Bhujanga Rao, Thirupatanna, and a private individual have also been added as co-accused.
Crucially, Praneeth Rao disclosed pivotal details during the seven-day interrogation period, revealing Prabhakar Rao's involvement in orchestrating the phone tapping endeavors. The police have confirmed that the tapping primarily revolved around Prabhakar Rao, underscoring the gravity of his alleged role in the illicit surveillance activities. Furthermore, it has come to light that Praneeth Rao, on Prabhakar Rao's instructions, obliterated the tapping equipment, although the police managed to recover the damaged hard disk.
The remand report further implicates Praneeth in tapping the numbers provided by Bhujangarao and Thirupatanna, indicating a coordinated effort among the accused individuals. During his confession, Praneeth admitted to tapping the phones of numerous political leaders and their family members, focusing particularly on their movements and fundraising activities during elections. Notably, the scope of the operation extended beyond political figures to encompass prominent businessmen and members of society.
In a startling revelation, Praneeth disclosed the destruction of the primary tapping device and the incineration of all documents stored in two locker rooms, underscoring the extent of efforts to conceal evidence. As the investigation unfolds, the police are diligently working to recover the damaged tapping device and piece together the intricate details of this elaborate scheme.
The revelations from the remand report unveil a complex web of deceit and collusion, implicating high-profile individuals in what appears to be a meticulously orchestrated operation of illicit surveillance and espionage. As the case progresses, further revelations are anticipated, shedding light on the full extent of the alleged wrongdoing and its repercussions.
Post a Comment